I dislike abusive language used against anyone, regardless of whether I agree with them or how distasteful, obnoxious or hateful are their views.

Yes, I understand the temptation only too well. As have many others, I've served in the forces and worked in many situations where 'bad', (I'd prefer, 'uncomfortable' or 'unnecessarily abusive' or 'unfortunate' or some such), or 'gutter' language was common. The result? It is easy for it to become a habit when one dislikes something or someone and I have been and am guilty as anyone. I don't hold any moral ground.

However, when one indulges in swearing or abusive terms, in my view, it belittles oneself more than it does the targeted. So, regardless of any 'moral' concerns, it is not only unattractive and likely to 'turn off' many to what you have to say but also labels you as 'less than'.

I am just as concerned that rational and intelligent 'debate' has been replaced by slanging, dirt-mongering and besmirching opponents. In my view, one of the most notable attributes amongst the many of Kamala Harris, is that, (at least to the best of my knowledge), she avoids that behaviour. Instead and I believe naturally, she makes her points with intellect, intelligence, evidence and articulation that is a delight to witness. Instead of abuse, she shines a light where mostly there is little or none.

I would that other politicians would take note of that model and re-invigorate political discourse for the benefit of us all.