I'm not sure to what your 'pay per view' comment refers nor how it has any relevance to Barry Gander's article or my own response to it.

Your criticism that my point was not "well argued" is also both irrelevant in relation to Barry Gander's post and, on the basis you assert it, wrong.

I suggest that you would do well to take the time and make the effort to inform yourself on the issues about which you comment; to improve your command of grammatical expression of your views; and to actually put yourself 'on the line', so to speak, before negatively criticising others who put thought and effort into what they write.

When one simply professes mostly negative and simplistic assessments of the views of others, the impression it leaves is certainly less than favourable.