Me too and weren't we just glad to be able to avail ourselves of the ability to connect?

Today, it seems, that we are so spoilt for choice that there is a ubiquitous tendency to criticise even excellent products and generally on the basis of triviality.

Surely the main point of the original poster is not so much a technical one but one of principle and warning.

The technical attacks on Firefox are, in my view, generally invalid whilst the failings of other supposedly better browers are ignored and/or unmentioned.

The warning is of giving away choice and made on a valid reference to the continuing demise of or acquisition of other browsers, many of which were far better and more user orientated than Chrome.

Do all these Chrome afficionados look forward to a not too distant future when there is *no* choice, simply a monopoly?