Your abusive assessment of this article is inappropriate. It also shows an extremely poor understanding.

The 'drivel' as you call it, lies in the biased and moronic adoration and promotion of an obsolescent institution which no longer deserves any place in our society or even the World.

The article you deride actually contributes to calling out the perfidy and puerile allegations and drivel that support the continuation of the absurdity of a Royal Family.

Put simply, the author is doing very much what you claim you would prefer, that the preoccupation with a pointless institution and the characters within it ought to cease.